I should also point out that in some contexts (and in the view of some law enforcement agencies) it may well BE illegal, depending on the nature of the images.Īlso, what may be considered art or acceptable photography in Europe may be considered child pornography in the USA. In other words just because it may not actually be illegal if done in the right context, doesn't mean you won't regret it. Sturges also defended himself through a series of talks and interviews." Sturges received more support from civil libertarians and artistic associations. Protestors picketed at major bookstores around the country which stocked his works. Later in the same year, his work came under attack by Christian conservatives led by Operation Rescue and Focus on the Family. Eventually Sturges got most of his work and equipment back. After over a year of investigation, the case was thrown out by a grand jury. The art world and naturist communities were enraged, and publicly defended him. In April 1990, FBI agents raided his studio, confiscating his equipment and his work, and alleged he was creating child pornography. As such, some critics have claimed that his work is child pornography disguised as fine art. ".Many of Sturges' works feature young girls and boys in the nude. However just ask Jock Sturges about the can of worms you may be opening. It's not always illegal to shoot pictures of them in swimwear, lingerie or even nude. I should point out that it's not illegal to shoot images of minors. Then after she signs you shoot tests for her through the agency. If you find a girl who is 5'10", 34-24-34 and freak'n amazing looking and turns out to be 15 you should be escorting the girl and her parents to the best agency you have connections with. It is one obvious difference between a pro photographer and a MWC. If you regularly present work featuring models who are outside accepted industry parameters you will develop zero credibility. As a pro, by default that's what shooting with you is.įrom a career point of view shooting minors is less the problem than shooting minors or would be models of any age, who are not competitive and are not going to work, who are not with a creditable agency already or ready to walk in and sign. Minors do not have the right to engage a person in a business enterprise. If you meet a potential client and they turn out to be underage you tell them it's been great meeting but any further communications must be initiated by their parents. Something akin to if I punch a guy and break his jaw, oops, if a pro kick boxer in the same location under the same circumstances punches a guy and breaks his jaw- it's assault with a deadly weapon. The Charles River " hairless" rat mutation is distinct from the hairless mouse alleles.While everyone is handing out their two cents.Ī professional photographer simply can not shoot minors for fun like anyone else can. The Charles River (CR) " hairless" rat is one of the autosomal recessive hypotrichotic animal models actively studied in pharmacologic and dermatologic research. Despite its widespread use, the molecular basis of this monogenic mutation remains unknown, and the skin histologic features of this phenotype have never been described. However, the designation " hairless" has been used as an extension of the hairless mouse (hr) nomenclature on the basis of the clinical absence of hairs in both phenotypes. We present a description of the histopathologic changes in heterozygous and homozygous CR hairless rat mutants during the first month of life. The postnatal homozygous rat skin was characterized by abnormal keratinization of the hair shaft and formation of a thick and dense layer of corneocytes in the lower portion of the epidermal stratum corneum. This layer prevented the improperly keratinized hair shaft from penetrating the skin surface. Starting from the latest stages of hair follicle (HF) development, obvious signs of HF degeneration were observed in homozygous skin. This process was extremely rapid, and by day 12, mainly atrophic HFs with abnormal or broken hairs were present in the skin. Therefore, the mutation in the CR rat abrogates cell proliferation in the hair matrix and affects keratinocyte differentiation in the HF and interfollicular epidermis, a phenotype that is completely distinct from hr/hr. To test whether the CR rat harbored a mutation in the hr gene, we analyzed the coding region of this gene and consensus intron splice site sequences in mutant rats and found no mutation, further supporting phenotypic evidence that the hairless phenotype in CR rats is not allelic with hairless.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |